Re: Linksys WAPPOE12 issue -- PCTECH

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Linksys WAPPOE12 issue
From: Lukas Beeler <lukas.beeler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:34:19 +0200
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/pctech>
List-help: <mailto:pctech-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: PC Technical Discussion for iSeries Users <pctech.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:pctech@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/pctech>, <mailto:pctech-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/pctech>, <mailto:pctech-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 18:16, Jeff Crosby <jlcrosby@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Anyone got an idea? ÂSeen the same thing?

I can tell you that the Cisco POE Injectors (the "real" Cisco ones,
not the Cisco-Linksys stuff, which costs twice as much as your Access
point) weren't always that reliable.

I've bought a PoE-Capable Switch and never looked back.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Linksys WAPPOE12 issue , Jeff Crosby

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.