I'll chime in with something I learned that should open some eyes. I think I even posted it here earlier this year, or was that last year ? Time sure flies :-) Anyway, through the years and at two different jobs and all kinds of PC hard drive failures and with all kinds of disk recovery tools our track record of recovering a drive was dismal. It would happen from time to time but very rarely. Then I downloaded Knoppix and low and behold it could read a drive that the PC tools could not ! And we got stuff of off a "failed" hard drive just fine. I then went back and tried it on other "PC tools said dead" hard drives and guess what ? They were readable with Knoppix. So what the heck to you make of that ? Windows somehow marking a drive as bad and the various tools not being able to get around that ? And Knoppix can ? Chuck -----Original Message----- From: pctech-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:pctech-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of qsrvbas@xxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 10:36 PM To: pctech@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [PCTECH] Disk imminent failure handling I've got a PC that reports a "S.M.A.R.T. Bad, backup and replace" message at boot-up time. I know that this is a result of predictive failure analysis and that I need to get the existing drive out of there and put another in its place, but I'm not sure of exactly how it ought to be done. The drive is a Hitachi 160GB Serial ATA and I have a replacement. That drive is in fact currently physically installed as SATA2, but I'm not yet willing to power the PC back up to install the drive logically. That's because I don't really know what the steps should be anyway. The original drive was partitioned off as 20GB, 30GB and 70GB partitions giving three logical drives. All three partitions have been (apparently) successfully backed up into files in my AS/400's IFS. The PC runs a fully patched Win2K. It's possible that the PC will boot and run off of the 'bad' drive for another few months, or it might fail as soon as I start it back up again. Once the three backups completed, I wasn't quite so nervous. I _really_ don't want to run through the whole Win2K install and all of the downloads/patches, but I suppose it could be done. Does anybody have any experience to pass on? Thanks for any advice on procedures. Tom
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.