|
Folks: For a while I've been using limited greylisting on my mail server with reasonably good success. Last weekend I implemented site wide and I have to say the results are dramatic. The amount of spam (even low rated by spamassassin) has dropped off significantly. Detailed information on greylisting can be found at http://projects.puremagic.com/greylisting/, but in a nutshell: Greylisting relies on the fact that spammers don't use normal mail servers. Basically, the first time a mail server receives a mail delivery request, it responds with a soft failure ... with a message indicating that greylisting is in effect and they should retry the delivery in certain amount of time (this is a human readable message, not machine readable). Since normal mail servers will accept this message and requeue the message for delivery, mail will be delivered normally (probably on the next pass). Spammers aren't that persistent, so they just go on to their next target. A good greylisting implementation retains the list of servers that have successfully delivered in a whitelist, so the next time they try to deliver there is no delay, the delay is only encountered once. I've got my mail server configured to greylist servers for only 2 minutes ... so the next time the server tries to deliver, it's almost certain to be successful the next time. I'm using Milter-greylist (http://hcpnet.free.fr/milter-greylist/) with sendmail. It was easy to setup and works great. david
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.