Re: Leap second -- PCTECH

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Leap second
From: Bill <billzbubb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 07:21:51 -0800
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/pctech>
List-help: <mailto:pctech-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: PC Technical Discussion for iSeries Users <pctech.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:pctech@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/pctech>, <mailto:pctech-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/pctech>, <mailto:pctech-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Yes, it is interesting, but from another viewpoint: Why would theyspend the time to code for this when almost everyone would be synchingtheir clocks to a time server?


Bill

David Gibbs wrote:

Ok, this is kind of interesting.

I was looking at the syslog messages on my linux system, I saw this
message: Clock: inserting leap second 23:59:60 UTC.

I knew there was a leap second this year ... but I was kind of amazed
that my Redhat 7.3 system would know about it.

david

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Leap second , David Gibbs
Re: Leap second , Jeff Crosby

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.