Good News Everybody!
The new search engine is LIVE!
Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.
|
I'd still say the extra money for 3.4+GHz isn't worth it in your situation. You may do better to get an extra GB of RAM instead. BTW, Kingston & other 3rd parties have compatable RAM that's a fair bit cheaper than IBM-brand: http://www.ec.kingston.com/ecom/configurator/modelsinfo.asp?SysID=19842& mfr=IBM&model=eServer+xSeries+226+%288648&Sys=19842-IBM-eServer+xSeries+ 226+%288648-xxx%29&distributor=0&submit1=Search Hey, my comments were made as someone who uses a 15K boot disk on his home PC. Yeah, it is a ton faster (my wife's PC had a 10K SCSI disk). The question, though, is how important is disk performance after things load up? WDSC, WAS, Java, etc. are RAM pigs; more RAM may be a better choice than the more expensive disk. Re: External USB drive for backup: Good choice. Ah yes, the MS dev thing. Great choice. Definitely the way to go for your needs.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.