|
I'd still say the extra money for 3.4+GHz isn't worth it in your situation. You may do better to get an extra GB of RAM instead. BTW, Kingston & other 3rd parties have compatable RAM that's a fair bit cheaper than IBM-brand: http://www.ec.kingston.com/ecom/configurator/modelsinfo.asp?SysID=19842& mfr=IBM&model=eServer+xSeries+226+%288648&Sys=19842-IBM-eServer+xSeries+ 226+%288648-xxx%29&distributor=0&submit1=Search Hey, my comments were made as someone who uses a 15K boot disk on his home PC. Yeah, it is a ton faster (my wife's PC had a 10K SCSI disk). The question, though, is how important is disk performance after things load up? WDSC, WAS, Java, etc. are RAM pigs; more RAM may be a better choice than the more expensive disk. Re: External USB drive for backup: Good choice. Ah yes, the MS dev thing. Great choice. Definitely the way to go for your needs.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.