Good News Everybody!
The new search engine is LIVE!
Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.
|
> -----Original Message----- > From: pctech-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx / Mike Wills > Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 11:45 AM > > I find the spam filtering in Thunderbird doesn't learn as fast or is > as good as SpamBayes for Outlook. Spambayes is by far the best spam > filter I have used. The I am still trying to teach Thunderbird about > some spam, and I have been using Thunderbird for months. But overall > it catches a good portion of the spam. Do you have a link for SpamBayes? Price? > Outlook 2003 (supposively) has Bayesian filtering, but I don't like > the interface they have in Outlook, it is too clunky. To date at work, > I am using a combination of 3 spam filters. The first is the corporate > Barracuda, then Outlooks spam filter, then as the catch all, I am > using the SpamBayes plugin. I haven't seen a spam in my inbox for a > very long time. How do you know if you're missing any good emails (fales positives?) that the Barracuda filters out? I presume the other two can at least move any "junk" to another folder so you can review? tia, db
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.