RE: Re: sp@m filtering for Mozilla 1.7 email client

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pctech-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx / Mike Wills
> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 11:45 AM
>
> I find the spam filtering in Thunderbird doesn't learn as fast or is
> as good as SpamBayes for Outlook. Spambayes is by far the best spam
> filter I have used. The I am still trying to teach Thunderbird about
> some spam, and I have been using Thunderbird for months. But overall
> it catches a good portion of the spam.

Do you have a link for SpamBayes?  Price?

> Outlook 2003 (supposively) has Bayesian filtering, but I don't like
> the interface they have in Outlook, it is too clunky. To date at work,
> I am using a combination of 3 spam filters. The first is the corporate
> Barracuda, then Outlooks spam filter, then as the catch all, I am
> using the SpamBayes plugin. I haven't seen a spam in my inbox for a
> very long time.

How do you know if you're missing any good emails (fales positives?) that
the Barracuda filters out?  I presume the other two can at least move any
"junk" to another folder so you can review?

tia,
db