× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Dan Bale wrote:

Jim Franz mentioned "I use Zone Alarm Pro and have no problem w/Live Update.
But I set it to where I have to approve every connection."  Doesn't this get
to be time-consuming?  And how easy/difficult is it to identify the
application that is sending and/or the data that is sent?

It can seem annoying at first. Pretty much every unique kind of communications request generates an inquiry. And if you don't take a look at the product displays, you don't learn how to make categories of rules instead of specific ones.


For example, Windows Update can access dozens of IP addresses. Microsoft has multiple groups of IP addresses and DNS can resolve to different groups at different times on the same day. I ran into this a couple months ago. If you try to approve by individual IP address, you'll convince yourself that the product is nuts. But you'll learn that you should take one of the many alternatives and instead simply grant the Windows Update process the ability to access the Internet and be done with it. Unless...

John Jones mentions that his software firewall "detects when an
application's EXE
file has changed and forces me to re-authorize it for 'net access."  Might I
ask which firewall app does this?

...you get some unexpected message that says something like "Windows Update has changed and is asking for permission to access the Internet." If you have done nothing that might cause a change to Windows Update itself, then you better consider rejecting the request and investigating. ZoneAlarm, and I imagine many other S/W firewalls, works this way.


The other consideration I have is performance.  This is a 233MHz CPU with
128MB of RAM, running Win98SE.

This is a 266Mhz PC running W2K with 56K dialup. ZoneAlarm doesn't seem to make much difference. The big "performance" hit is when I start some function, walk away and come back an hour later to find "XXX is requesting access Y/N". Rats. Okay, I grant the request, go away and come back later again. But that's the price I've chosen to pay. It's infrequent.


For most things, A/V is a much bigger hit.

Tom Liotta


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.