×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Jim Franz wrote:
port 445 to infect and I would "guess" from the size of the
infection it is not blocked by default - anyone know?
Do remember that a corporate firewall and your
average dsl/broadband router setups are very different.
Based on the size of the infection, I would surmise that either a) The
virus doesn't propagate exclusively via the direct TCP connections or b)
Most people aren't behind routers.
As I have stated before ... a NATing router does not allow external
traffic in. It's not a mater of blocking ports ... the ports are not
open to be blocked.
Want to check it out ... visit http://www.dslreports.com/scan and run a
port scan when you are behind a router.
david
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.