|
> 1) Does the mere presence of IE make it "hazardous" > or do you actually have to use it to be vulnerable? My understanding is that IE is so tightly integrated with the OS that it can be difficult to tell when you are using IE. > 2) Is anyone using Firefox? Yes, right this moment. I like it a lot, but there are a few sites that only work with IE. Thankfully, those sites are becoming more Moz-friendly. > 3) Does Firefox have an email client (yet)? Yes, Thunderbird. Works pretty well for email and newsgroups. > Anyway, it seems as though I was somewhat > protected by using Win95 because all of the > vulnerabilities that were being exploited were > "newer" technology that MS added in after Win95 While true that some of the exploits are only present in 98 and above, there are tons of exploits that work on 95. > I am connected to the internet via cable with > a Gigafast router/firewall, and I use Norton AV > and Spybot. Is it a fair question to > ask whether I am in good shape? It's a fair question. I wish I had a definitive answer. I'm DSL via a D-Link router that does NAT. I haven't seen much getting through Norton Internet Security and AV, Spybot and Ad-Aware. So I hope that we are both in good shape! --buck
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.