|
~~~Is the administrative fee documented in the contracts? If ~~~so, is the $10K ~~~specifically mentioned? ~~~ ~~~Such a charge to generate a new license key for a user-based ~~~license is ~~~unethical, but it sounds like you're gonna be beating your ~~~heads against a ~~~brick wall. You might start by demanding an itemized, ~~~detail quote for the ~~~fee. Yes, I think there is going to be a lot of fallout soon. The train is not sustainable. There is a good thread on this issue in the midrange.com BPCS list archive if you missed it. This vendor has participation on midrange.com so we know it is loud and clear. I have an associate that took employment at an installation with a very old install, that is unsupported. (which was surprise #1) I doubt many have seen this version since Y2K preps. The installation I am referencing has not been on vendor support for more than several years. Now the vendor wants back pay plus the 10K license key fee. I don't want to name numbers but I am sure it is much more than 100K. Now "that" is taking advantage of a situation. Not only is it ridiculous, even a very healthy company would never go for that. The only objective is: Continue normal ops after new CPU on the same tier. This is the equivalent of a vendor saying "We have you by the XXXXX, sooner or later you are going to have a failure or need an upgrade and call us" In my book, the vendor has lost all respect and will never again thrive. I am surprised that IBM does not squeeze policy's gone astray such as this. It's bad for IBM, in fact are losing big sales over this. Green Streak had a hidden streak. I sure would like to know what a Jan. 2003 new prospect for this vendor is thinking when they get close to signing on, think they know about the ticking time bomb this thread is referring to? One more example, concerning a long time well respected AS/400 forms software company. Charging a surprise fee for license key on an upgrade to V5R2, where the new OS level triggered the key mechanism. You have a grace period to decide, the software now contains apparently an undocumented expiration, perhaps a new feature slipped into an upgrade, and it was a surprise. Both of these came to my attention in the last few weeks so not ancient history here. I ask! Enron-training? Bad economy? not enough H1-B? Mortgage too big? or What? Mark Villa in Charleston SC
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.