|
On Monday 21 January 2002 9:39 pm, Ken Sims wrote: > Hi Mike - > > >That is what I was thinking... AOL must want to hit the OS market now. > > And since Red Hat is a relatively solid system. They can take that > > and bloom off of that. You know if AOL did do that, I would take a > > look at it, even if it is from AOL. Reason? It is not Microsnot > > software. > > Red Hat is only one of many redistributors of Linux. > > My next home system will probably be Linux. I was leaning toward the > Red Hat distribution, but not if AOL is taking it over. > > Ken Hi Ken If you want to avoid the possibility of your chosen distro being subject to a less than favourable buy-out, try Debian[1]. It's produced & maintained entirely by volunteers - no commercial pressure and arguably the best packaging system of the lot. Regards, Martin [1] http://www.debian.org -- martin@dbg400.net jamaro@firstlinux.net http://www.dbg400.net /"\ DBG/400 - DataBase Generation utilities - AS/400 / iSeries Open \ / Source free test environment tools and others (file/spool/misc) X [this space for hire] ASCII Ribbon Campaign against HTML mail & news / \
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.