Re: Changed to: Interactive Tax

Please note, I've cc'd you directly because I have moved this topic to
midrange-nontech and I didn't know if you subscribed.

Leif Svalgaard wrote:

>according to your logic, Microsoft is not a monopoly (you can always use
>a Mac or Unix or ...), yet it was judged a monopoly. A New Years Resolution
>of mine: not use bandwidth on fruitless arguments (if I can keep it is
>another matter :-)
>
Microsoft was found to be a monopoly because it was found that exactly
what you are saying is not true. It astonishes me how difficult it is to
get that simple message through to some people. I suppose it comes from
how much they wish it wasn't true so that so much of what they've been
saying wouldn't be so very wrong.

While there are market segments or niches where it is possible to
replace Microsoft products with an alternative, it is not possible for
the vast majority of users. This is a very large and complex issue but I
would think that just about anybody with the desire could come to
understand it. However, the first step is to be willing to accept the truth.

--
Chris Rehm
javadisciple@earthlink.net

Beloved, let us love one another: for love is of God; and every one
that loveth is born of God, and knoweth God. 1 John 4:7