|
jt wrote: > "Geezers", like myself and a few others, know that reaching the > standard set by M$ doesn't amount to much, once you've gotten to > know the 38/400/i platform real well... Just think about what the M$ standard is for a moment. Their primary goal is to make tons and tons of money, and they're rather good at it. Software just happens to be the means by which they do it. If the software they produce gives them the highest possible return, why should they change anything? If you judge them by the same standard by which they judge themselves they are A1. > I wouldn't say these things, if I was talking to the developers of > the InfoCenter, but since that ain't likely to be permitted I get > frustrated... (However, I DO realize this might get back to them > somehow.. So I apologize, in advance...) This isn't a flame on the > InfoCenter team, but an old-fashioned butt-whuppin'.. and MHO of an > easy way to fix the problem: Just set the bar higher... I don't think your statements are too controversial. I've not heard one good word about InfoCenter. Dave... _________ ,___o __________ _\ <;_ ___________ (_)/ (_) http://www.twickenhamcc.co.uk ======================================================= The opinions expressed in this communication are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of my employer.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.