|
>> Jim: >> If I've got e-mail that I don't want stored on my company's >> e-mail servers I >> just abuse my corporate Internet privileges to access my AOL >> account via the >> web. > Phil: >If there is a policy that prohibits my use of the company's internet access >to access my Yahoo mail, then I would be guilty of that. I agree. That's why I used the word "abuse". > Phil: >This, according to a post from Janet Krueger, isn't safe either. >...But I did not >forfeit my right to privacy of the content of the transmission. All that I >forfeited was the privacy of the transmission (ie not the content). I agree again -- captured web content is an unexpected side-effect of browser cache, sniffers, and anal-retentive management. Also, my point about content on telephone is flawed. Even if I abuse my company's long-distance policy I don't expect to have my calls recorded and judged for their content. From the perspective of phone and web transaction content I can see yours and Nathan's points about e-mail content. Then again, content has relevance -- if you run the office copy machine for personal use I could understand if you were reprimanded for copy your taxes, but fired for copying your butt. I suppose I'm more comfortable with captured e-mail than captured Internet traffic, and I feel that your average company would be less likely to store your Internet text than messages you generated within their own e-mail database. Still, if my company captured my AOL web mail entries through their firewall I don't think I'd be indignant. I'd feel personally responsible for assuming that my transactions on their server were private. Again, even if they were just keeping a rolling day of Internet traffic in files for throughput/performance monitoring it could be recalled by a higher power during an audit or subpoena. I could be wrong, but I believe that your love letters to the person in the next office could be pulled from a recycle bin for an audit. Admittedly I'm riding the fence between my version of "common sense" and the law. I know that US Mail is protected by privacy laws. Even if you sent a letter using your office's paper, envelopes and postal meter your company doesn't have the right to open it (though I wonder if they have the right to open your mail if it's addressed to the company's location). I don't know whether I believe that all forms of communication should be deemed private, or whether you should only expect privacy from specifically protected mediums. For right now it appears that if the law doesn't explicitly guarantee e-mail privacy I shouldn't expect privacy. I think it will require specific legislation, not broad interpretation of existing laws. For this reason I have no expectation of privacy for anything generated on my office computer. -Jim James P. Damato Manager - Technical Administration Dollar General Corporation <mailto:jdamato@dollargeneral.com>
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.