|
All the hullabaloo about AI is largely smokescreen for "Danger, Will
Robinson!" The movie screen version of AI is a transparent attempt to get
used to thinking that algorithms actually have a sentient life of their
own. You got the robot that fell in love and was remade to age in one,
haha, and in a Brit series you had robots all over that suddenly all became
self-aware and quit slaving for their owners, and they got humans who
defended their "human rights". Let loose your belly laugh now.
When 4GL was the rage, writing generating read-add-update-print loops was
quick and simple, but that didn't last long because there are too many
twists and turns and exception values to code for, and so on.
But they made 4GL more sophisticated now: AI. BUT too many black-box
applications, hello?! Trust a company to check itself? No, thanks! Remember
the scientific method? It's rigorous for a reason. You want trust? How can
we trust, after all the stolen elections of history, five days of counting
past the deadline to flip the winner, and so on.
It's time to stop fooling ourselves. Unleash our brains from the chains of
patents and copyright!
A tech at a U.S. copier maker once complained to me about the new wave of
Japanese copiers. Change just one little thing, he said, and voilà, they
get a totally new patent! TESLA got robbed by the patent office: they
nullified his patent on radio and gave to Marconi (cheaper) and after they
squeezed the first juice out of it they returned it to Tesla. The big guys
like IBM and Apple and Microsoft, they build big patent bundles and trade
agreements with the other big guys. Ever see the patent Microsoft got for
matching country codes with countries they match to? :) Hahaha.
*
On 04/08/2026 9:34 AM EDT Charles Wilt <charles.wilt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Mythos
I noticed that IBM isn't on this list:
https://www.anthropic.com/glasswing
Which is a bit concerning given what's detailed here:
https://red.anthropic.com/2026/mythos-preview/
Granted, I suppose IBM i and z/OS aren't particularly in danger from
as they are closed source. But IBM has enough hands in Open Sourcelist
projects that I would have expected them to be involved.
Perhaps they are involved, and just got left off the list.
Charles
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxrelated questions.
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.