Re: CPF377F Save ended. Unable to reach checkpoint

[Gad Miron <gadmiron@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks again guys

This is an home grown Web application that loads EDI files
that can be of considerable size, so it may be still running while the
nightly save kicks in.

Rob's replay got me thinking though,
I'll ask our web developer to commit every NNN records and not at file end
only.

Txs you all
Gad


> date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 09:55:37 -0400
> from: Rob Berendt <robertowenberendt@xxxxxxxxx>
> subject: Re: CPF377F Save ended. Unable to reach checkpoint
>
> And some might argue why are people not committing their transactions in a
> timely basis?  This may be what you really need to do.  This may be
> difficult in some situations.  Thinking on your specific example and the
> client based program involved, you might need to train that developer to
> commit on a frequent basis, or to do their updates WITH NC.  Or to change
> their odbc connection to one which can be defaulted to WITH NC
>
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2026 at 9:36?AM Gad Miron <gadmiron@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Jim, Rob
> >
> > I just wonder why IBM tolerates a situation
> > when an object cannot be saved because it's locked for other reasons.
> >  - by issuing a  CPF3761 Cannot use XXX in Library YYY
> >
> > and do not tolerate a locked object by "commit pending"
> >
> >
> > Gad
> > --
> > This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
> list
> > To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> > visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> > or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> > at https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
> >
> > Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
> > questions.