Re: Kerberos and SYSREQ 1 -- MIDRANGE-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Kerberos and SYSREQ 1
From: Stephen Landess <steve_landess@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2026 01:00:28 +0000
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

If you revoke the users authority to the TFRSECJOB command, I'm thinking that the SYSREQ 1 will fail - have you tried it ?

Regards,
Steve Landess
(512) 289-0387

________________________________
smith5646midrange@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

Rob,

I am very confused how this relates to my question of blocking SYSREQ 1. They will be allowed to open as many ACS sessions as they want. I just want to block the SYSREQ 1 because they have no way to log in on the secondary job.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Kerberos and SYSREQ 1 , Daniel Gross

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.