|
Nice tool, but compared to pure focus on SQL hardcore interactive handling, interface ergonomy and design choice, BLOB handling during save, etc... I still prefer the aforementioned tool.Also, for example, if I generate a DDL from a table for IBMi , Dbeaver loses a lot of IBMi specific detail (long / short names, record format), while SQLWJ uses native procedure GENERATE_SQL so is not "jdbc inferred"...also dbexplorer is in a table format not in a nonsensical "tree" ... and it says "library" not schema ;DDDYes Dbeaver community !!!
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
