Re: Changing processing program of IBM commands

Subject: Re: Changing processing program of IBM commands - Legality, etc
From: David Gibbs <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 16:02:35 -0500
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 3:55 PM Brad Stone <bvstone@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I've been getting a lot of people asking me if they can keep using IBM
commands like SNDDST to send email but have MAILTOOL handle the processing
in the background.

Could be as simple as putting a new command in a user library above qsys on
the system library list that has the same parameters as the IBM command,
but invokes your program instead.

david

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Changing processing program of IBM commands - Legality, etc , Brad Stone

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.

Re: Changing processing program of IBM commands - Legality, etc