|
To me, the way one company alone decides what happens with a hardware
or software product, as demonstrated in this discussion. Tech
companies try to lock the customer handcuffed to whatever the maestro
has. From what I saw from a distance, Oracle is an extreme example of
lock-in: it looks like their software is made to resist out-migration.
Long story short, in my opinion, if the world as we know it lasts that
long, copyright law and patent law is eventually going to go the way
of the dodo bird. Might happen slow for awhile, then all at once.
Open and free software at least is already on the way. It's gotten
stalled, because momentum, and because of my point. It becomes
complicated and even costly for a business to migrate systems.
IBM i shops already are adopting open source. Apache, multi-layer
communications protocol, Linux here, Linux there.
Even patents. A Kaypro customer at one company that made parts for
copiers early in the PC era told me that every time they innovated
some new thing, that a Japanese company would change some little thing
and they would get a brand new patent. A CFO at one company I worked
at in Cuba, said a mechanic for the farm collective he worked for
asked him to pick up a Ford (1954 I
think) truck manual, on his trip to Havana, that the mechanic said he
needed to fix a Soviet-made truck, because it's exactly the same truck.
Patents sham-ments.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.