Re: Costco still on IBM i? -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Costco still on IBM i?
From: Patrik Schindler <poc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 May 2025 17:38:34 +0200
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Hello Marco,

Am 25.05.2025 um 17:11 schrieb Marco Facchinetti <marco.facchinetti@xxxxxxxxx>:

- Send to IBM the wrong signal (a lack of IWS adoption is a bad signal)

From a business perspective, the question isn't about which signal is wrong or right but how to benefit said business in a cost-efficient way. Sending whatever signals to IBM is not a viable business. That's what COMMON is for, for example.

Otherwise I completely agree with Daniel's statements.

:wq! PoC

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.