Re: Using /home for application directories

One could argue that if you use root you open up security concerns, but those exist in /home as well.

Ther is no systemic reason to use either other than exposing the root to much.

In the end it’s a design decision. A shallower root is a slight bit faster to back up/restore but with current equipment that’s not much of a reason

I’m afraid there are not any real facts to support one approach or the other.

Proper security is the key.


Jim Oberholtzer
Agile Technology Architects

On Feb 18, 2025, at 7:05 PM, smith5646midrange@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

My client has been creating directories in the /home directory for
applications such as /home/finance. This seems wrong to me. Although
obviously not a system requirement, I was taught that /home is the root for
user folders such as /home/jsmith and applications should have their own
directory not in /home.



Is there a reason why they should quit using /home or a reason why they
should continue this practice? I know that question seems subject to
opinions but I am not looking for opinion.I am after facts. Does using
/home cause any type of problems? Does creating individual application
folders in root (such as /finance, /sales, /inventory, etc.) cause any
problems?

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.