Re: [7.3] IFS save 21 vs. sav with chgperiod (no BRMS!) -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: [7.3] IFS save 21 vs. sav with chgperiod (no BRMS!)
From: Patrik Schindler <poc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2025 14:22:52 +0100
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Hello Rob,

Am 13.02.2025 um 13:43 schrieb Rob Berendt <robertowenberendt@xxxxxxxxx>:

CHGATR '/mydir/myfile' ALWSAV(*NO)

Thanks again for that hint, it solved the issue. Differential backups are now much smaller in size and consistently increase in size.

20G 0-20250213.udf
273M 1-20250214.udf
368M 1-20250215.udf
462M 1-20250216.udf

Using NFS backed image catalogs is challenging at first, but I learned to like them a lot! I'm very grateful to Diego Kesselman for his descriptions to get me started!

:wq! PoC

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

NFS Backed image catalogs Was: [7.3] IFS save 21 vs. sav with chgperiod (no BRMS!) , Rob Berendt

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.