|
All,
The vendor got back to me and said they opened up the tool to allow it to
see system tables.
Based on this, I believe Jim was right in saying I should open a ticket
with IBM.
How is this view being created, which based on discussions with internal
developers, created no differently than other views, so as an object it is
being seen as a system table.
Ken
-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Ken
Meade via MIDRANGE-L
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2024 9:34 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ken Meade <kmeade@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [ EXTERNAL ]Re: When is a View not a View
Martijn and All,
These views are all in the same library and All looked normal in the sys
catalogs.
UPDATE:
The vendor for my new product sent me an updated Jar file last night and
we got it loaded this morning. It has addressed the issue within this
toolset.
I do have some open questions as to what they did to make this work, and
if I get an answer I'll report back here.
Like I had noted this is also happening in the ODBC driver, not associated
with this vendor's product and so, my feeling is that there is something,
somewhere that is defining these objects a bit differently. But, I'm not
finding it in any of the QSYS2 files I've looked at thus far.
But it's working where I need it working, and so I can continue our
migration process.
Thanks to all with your ideas!
Ken
-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of
Martijn van Breden
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2024 2:01 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ EXTERNAL ]Re: When is a View not a View
[You don't often get email from m.vanbreden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
Learn why this is important at
https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
Hello Ken,
That's pretty peculiar... a couple of things pop up in my head:
1.
Are these views all defined in the same library/schema?
2.
If not, are all libraries defined as schemas, so with their own views on
the catalog?
3.
Do you see any particular differences in their definitions when you query
the views in the system catalog (qsys2.sysviews and qsys2.sysviewdep)
Kind regards, Met vriendelijke groet,
Martijn van Breden
lead software architect
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.