Re: ODBC connections and QAQQINI -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: ODBC connections and QAQQINI
From: Charles Wilt <charles.wilt@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 16:33:16 -0600
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 3:51 PM Patrik Schindler <poc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

using a model 150 running V4R5 for hobbyist purposes.

That's your real problem...

There's a reason IBM came out with the SQL Query Engine (SQE) in v5r2, as
opposed to keeping the Classic Query Engine (CQE).

Not to mention how small a 150 is to begin with.

Charles

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: ODBC connections and QAQQINI , Patrik Schindler

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.