Re: Things that would prevent the deletion of a PF

Sure: object auditing in the audit journal. Been there for quite some time going back to systems long ago forgotten and no longer used. Lots of information on IBMs web site to set this up.

You also can use exit programs on the commands. Again, that’s wildly documented.

Jim Oberholtzer
Agile Technology Architects

On Jun 19, 2024, at 12:46 PM, smith5646midrange@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

I need to programmatically find everything that would prevent the deletion
of a PF such as LFs, indexes, etc. Is there a table or function that I can
look at to find this information? I don't want to do a DSPDBR to an
outfile, Are there other things that will prevent the deletion of the PF
that I am not thinking of and where do I look for them to determine if they
exist (again looking for a table or function not a command to an outfile).
I'm not worried about object locks. These will all be obsolete PFs and if
someone has a lock on it, it needs to fail.

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.