× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. May 2024

Re: Will IBM ever expand system object names?

Be sure to search Ideas first - seems I've seen this already when reviewing in a CAAC meeting.


As Jon said, there are reasons not to, it would be a tremendous cost.


Cheers
Vern


On Wed, 29 May, 2024 at 10:09 AM, Diego E. KESSELMAN <diegokesselman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

You should create an IBM Idea

On 29/05/24 07:18, Javier Sanchez wrote:
With SQL objects this is already possible, and sometime in the future,
maybe we will be able to do everything using only SQL, which would be
fantastic.

What about in the meantime we could have expanded the current 10-char
system object name length to something longer?

This is one item on my wish list, and I could also consider including the
underscore character as a valid starting one for such names.

JS


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.