Re: IFS allow save object attribute?

It’s highly likely most of those files are marked that way by IBM since the LPP can recreate as needed

Ordinarily not a problem.

If “user” meaning not IBM files are marked that way they should not be needed for a recovery.



Jim Oberholtzer
Agile Technology Architects

On May 8, 2024, at 7:51 PM, James Ash via MIDRANGE-L <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I'm trying to clean up my IFS backups and I've had problems in the past with objects not being saved because the attribute to allow an object to be saved was *NO.

I'm having a hard time grasping why I wouldn't want to save this object (or any object) on my system and why this attribute even exists. It just seems like a setup for failure.

If I change all the *NO attributes to *YES, am I causing the failure of some process or is this all just about saving space and time on my backups?

Jim Ash
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.