RE: 725CPW vs 1450 IBM i Cloud System -- MIDRANGE-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: RE: 725CPW vs 1450 IBM i Cloud System
From: <stefan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 21:27:46 +0200
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Then bump the The Max Active in cmd WRKSYSSTS to 500 or similar for the pool where the QHTTPSVR is running ( likely in the *base pool, #2)
I guess that your SSI spins of a bunch of parallel threads when the pages load.

Best regards

Stefan

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.