<< I think MAPICS did that>>
That logic goes all the way back to IPICS, which was a card-based inventory system on the S/3 Mod 10 and Mod 15. It was supplanted by online IPICS on the S/3 Mod 15D. Those were the days.
-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of VERNON HAMBERG Owner via MIDRANGE-L
Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2024 3:43 PM
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: VERNON HAMBERG Owner <vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: RRN Reletive record number question
+1 Holger!
There was a time when the RRN was used to make things like a bill-of-materials - a linked list of things, and the RRN of the next item in the list was stored in a row. I think MAPICS did that - at least, that's the example of an application that relied on preserving RRNs.
Here are reasons not to say *YES on REUSEDLT, as listed in the 7.5 documentation -
Note: Because of the way the system reuses deleted record space, the following types of files should not be created or changed to reuse deleted record space:
* - Files processed using relative record numbers, and files used by an application to determine a relative record number that is used as a key into another file
* - Files used as queues
* - Any files used by applications that assume new record insertions are at the end of the file
* - When DB2® Symmetric Multiprocessing is installed, files on which you expect to have parallel index maintenance performed when rows are updated, inserted, or deleted
Cheers
Vern
On Thu, 4 Apr, 2024 at 12:51 PM, Holger Scherer <hs@xxxxxxx> wrote:
To: midrange systems technical discussion; midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
do not rely on RRN or their order at all.
Do rely on unique keys and time stamps if ordering is needed.
-h
------ Original Message ------
From "Timothy Feldmeier" <Timothy.Feldmeier@xxxxxxxx<mailto:Timothy.Feldmeier@xxxxxxxx>>
To "MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" <MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date 04.04.24<
http://04.04.24>, 17:09:37 Subject RRN Reletive record number question
I know the RRN can change when running a reorg, as it will reuse deleted records etc... My question is - would the order of the RRN every change for a record.
This would allow a program to keep the RRN order to be always reliable.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> for any subscription related questions.
.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.