×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Our company recently underwent penetration testing from an outside
vendor. Auditors are on the prowl.
The penetration tester (former hacker) was able to map a drive as
anonymous and modify one of our .sh scripts (BAD).
We removed GUEST in Netserver to resolve that issue.
However mgmt wants to further lock down of our program folder on the IFS
(primarily .py, .sh, .json).
We implemented the following:
We created two group profiles: TESTDEV and TESTAPPS
We created two user profiles: TESTPGMR and TESTUSER
TESTPGMR is a class *QPGMR, no special authorities, and has supplemental
group TESTDEV.
TESTUSER is class *QPGMR, no special authorities, and has supplemental
group TESTAPPS.
This allows for the pgmr to develop code; users to run code; and public
is locked out.
This folder looks like this now:
ls -al /testapps/TESTPGP
total 200
drwxr-s--- 3 testdev testapps 8192 Oct 12 16:21 .
drwx--Srwx 10 testown 0 28672 Jun 28 14:48 ..
-rwxr-x--- 1 testdev testapps 6270 Dec 14 2022 TESTPGP2.py
-rwxr-x--- 1 testdev testapps 190 Jul 23 20:26 TESTPGP2.sh
We tested:
1. Ability of anonymous user on a mapped drive changing anything in
/testapps/TESTPGP -- FAIL
2. Ability of TESTPGMR to change/creaste pgms in /testapps/TESTPGP -- PASS
3. Ability of TESTUSER to run pgms in /testapps/TESTPGP -- PASS
After further testing somehow the group in /testapps/TESTPGP was changed
to 121.
Now we can't run chgrp on the *IX side and get this message:
0481-002 chgrp: testapps is not a recognized group. Check the
/etc/group file for all known groups.
There is NO file /etc/group.
We see there is a db2 cmd Change Primary Group (CHGPGP).
Changing the group on the db2 does not change the group in ls -al
/testapps/TESTPGP.
What is the relationship between chgrp and CHGPGP?
Seems like since all of our code runs on the *IX side of the IBM I we
need chgrp.
Stuck here.
Thanks,
Jerry
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.