×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Rich,
This topic was discussed on this list just last month. See:
https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/202309/msg00275.html ;
I suggest you start by reading the entire thread.
Hope that helps,
Mark S. Waterbury
On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 10:45:35 PM EDT, Rich Marion <dpcmarion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I recently upgraded from V7R3 to V7R5 and noticed many of my SQLRPGLE program are now taking a super long time to complete. The program stack points to the SQL EXEC or the FETCH statements.
Today, one program was doing a simply "Insert Into" with the "select" having
a "Group By" over a single table (no joins or subqueries). It was supposed
to insert about 1.2 million records into a table that had over 700 million.
I let it run for 3 hours before I canceled it. It was adding about 25
records/second.
I manually executed the same "Select-Group by" and created a table with the 1.2 million records. Then I wrote an Old fashion read/write program via
RLA. This entire process took less than a half an hour.
Has anyone noticed performance issues with the V7R5 SQL Engine?
TIA
Rich
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.