Re: Using SNDNETF

I've always had a bit of a soft spot for SNADS because I like the
functionality of the SAVRST* commands:
- They need a bit less storage (not usually an issue these days)
- They are less hands on
- They are in place/set and forget operations
- SAVRST is arguably easier than FTP, particularly based on some of the
recent threads here
For comparison, the workflow is:
- SAVRSTOBJ ... <Done!>
- CRTSAVF .... SAVOBJ SAVF(xxx) ,,,, FTP SAVF .... RSTOBJ ... <Done!>
oh, forgot the SAVF Housekeeping....
But I don't particularly sweat over not being able to SNADS.



On Sat, Jul 8, 2023 at 8:03 AM a4g atl <a4ginatl2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I may have missed something from earlier threads.

Why do you not use SNDTCPSPLF for spool files. It does not needs SNADS and
works well?

Also don't you use DDM to copy files?

Last resort would be FTP, which is fast.

Darryl Freinkel
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.