On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 7:32 PM Gavin Inman <midrangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I once worked on a project that had a significant amount of vendor
provided source code in the IFS.
My experience was; it was difficult to work with.
That was probably before all the open source stuff really came to maturity
and before Liam Allan's Code for i extension to VSCode brought us into the
21st century.
It's outside the norm of having source in PF-SRC files and traditional
tools can't be used with the IFS source.
I respectfully disagree on your first point and I thank heaven for your
second point r: ssh, git, VSCode, Bob, etc., have made it possible for the
platform to onboard youngsters comfortably and for IBM i to continue for a
few more decades.
Note that RPG, CL, and COBOL can all be compiled from SRCPF or from IFS and
debugged from your workstation using VSCode with Code for i extension.
*If you're not just plugging the knotholes until off-platforming, then
source code in the IFS is very much the New Norm!*
*JACK WOEHR, IBM Champion 2021-2023
<
https://www.credly.com/users/jack-woehr/badges>*
*SENIOR IBM i ENGINEER*
303.847.8442
jwoehr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<
https://www.linkedin.com/in/jackwoehr/> stay connected
<
https://www.linkedin.com/company/absolute-performance-inc./>
<
https://www.absolute-performance.com/>
www.absolute-performance.com
NON-DISCLOSURE NOTICE: This communication including any and all
attachments is for the intended recipient(s) only and may contain
confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended
recipient of this communication, any disclosure, copying further
distribution or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received
this communication in error, please contact the sender and
delete/destroy all copies of this communication immediately.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.