I think that depends upon your system auditors.
I've worked at companies where no one should be using QPADEV* devices as all
access should have a name that matches a location/department to help pin
down issues.
I've also worked at companies where no one cared.
-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Sizer,
Joseph via MIDRANGE-L
Sent: Wednesday, September 7, 2022 8:21 AM
To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion' <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sizer, Joseph <JSizer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Deletion of Virtual Display Devices
There is a job on my system that I have inherited that executes at 3:00 AM.
The job varies off all virtual display devices (QPAD*) and then deletes
them. If they are needed again, the system will recreate them.
Does anyone else utilize this practice and do you see any benefit to purging
virtual display devices rather than just allowing them to accumulate?
We have had a couple recent occasions where the device description was not
deleted but the associated message queue was.
Joe Sizer
IBM I Power9 Administrator
Pencor Digital Services
Pencor Services, Inc.
462 Delaware Ave
Palmerton Pa 18071
Office: 610.826.9080 Ext. 2117
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.
Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate link:
https://amazon.midrange.com
midrange.com
