× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Inside the DO(), test H1 and make your processing contingent on that?

What if there is an unexpected error but no dump?

-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of James H. H. Lampert via MIDRANGE-L
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2022 4:20 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: James H. H. Lampert <jamesl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Detecting dumps in a CL program?

I have a CL program that calls a bunch of RPG programs.

The calls are in the form:

SNDMSG MSG('We experienced a problem with the +
FOO program, and are skipping the rest +

Normally, this works quite well. But today, we experienced an anomaly,
such that we would like very much for the CL program to respond
differently if a dump is taken on one of the called RPG programs.

I will note that when an *expected* error occurs, the RPG program will
respond with a SETON of indicators H1 and LR, followed by a RETURN. The
*unexpected* errors *don't* have an explicit SETON of H1. Can I maybe
use that?


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2023 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.