The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact email@example.com.
As Patrick alluded too, there is much more to this than the drive.
I agree that leaving the DTACPR and COMPACT parameters is correct. Let
the drive compress it will only slow down if you force it not to and it
will take more tape too, double fail.
From my experience the speed delta between 1/2 high and full high
drives is negligible.
Also from my experience, 'it's not the tape drive.' It almost never is
any more. Sure, back in the QIC or 8MM or even LTO1 drive days it often
was, but for most IBM i shops an LTO7 won't be the problem.
As you haven't mentioned anything about the size of the server,
processor, memory, number and type of arms, or the type of the data
being saved, we would only be guessing at what might help.
On 8/3/2022 3:37 AM, Gad Miron wrote:
I'm trying to speed up a nightly save to a 3580 LTO7 stand alone tape drive
and would like some advice with the following:
a. Will specifying COMPACT(*NO) on the SAVLIB CMD expedite matters ?
we now use DTACPR(*DEV) and COMPACT(*DEV)
b. On a 3580 spec web page I found a remark pertaining to Full Hight vs.
models . see remark No.7 on this page
Is a Full Hight model Faster the Half Hight? or Vice versa?
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2023 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.