Any reason NOT to add *NETSECURE to the QAUDLVL* system values? -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Any reason NOT to add *NETSECURE to the QAUDLVL* system values?
From: Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 17:11:23 +0000
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I am looking at the following and I'm trying to determine if there is any reason not to add *NETSECURE to the QAUDLVL* system values
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/i/7.4?topic=system-audit-journal

Rob Berendt
--
IBM Certified System Administrator - IBM i 6.1
Group Dekko
Dept 1600
Mail to: 7310 Innovation Blvd, Suite 104
Ft. Wayne, IN 46818
Ship to: 7310 Innovation Blvd, Dock 9C
Ft. Wayne, IN 46818
http://www.dekko.com

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Any reason NOT to add *NETSECURE to the QAUDLVL* system values? , Jim Oberholtzer
RE: Any reason NOT to add *NETSECURE to the QAUDLVL* system values? , stefan

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.