Re: Replacing a DTAQ with a USRQ -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Replacing a DTAQ with a USRQ
From: John Yeung <gallium.arsenide@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 20:56:52 -0500
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 7:58 PM Alan Campin <alan0307d@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

There is a fair amount of code and the service programs use my standard
error handler and my resolve object service programs so I am going to
create a Sourceforge project and put the code in there.

SF and not GitHub? Any particular reason why?

John Y.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.