Re: GDDM vs. Browser -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: GDDM vs. Browser
From: John Yeung <gallium.arsenide@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 15:02:01 -0500
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 2:02 PM Patrik Schindler <poc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I hoped for a somewhat more direct approach, aka, convert to GIF or PNG in the IFS?

GDDM for z seems to have a lot more goodies than for i, including
conversion to GIF.

I take it use of GDDM is one of those artificial restrictions you gave
yourself for hobbyist purposes?

John Y.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: GDDM vs. Browser , Patrik Schindler

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.