On 12/14/21 6:32 AM, Greg Wilburn wrote:
I thought I read somewhere that older versions (i.e 1.x) did not have the vulnerability.

As of yesterday, the general consensus was that log4j 1.x isn't vulnerable, but that is by no means certain, as log4j 1.x hasn't been supported for some time, and the log4j people at Apache have been concentrating their efforts on 2.x.

--
JHHL

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.