× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Matt

I’ll take a look at a couple possible solutions for you when I get into the office this morning.

Powertech Encryption is a great product and when there are concerns of performance with DB2 at rest encryption, it usually just extends to the nature of encryption itself and the functionality of field procedures.

Let me try a couple things related to your situation and I’ll provide an update later today.

Jay

On Jul 14, 2021, at 10:08 PM, Jay Vaughn <jeffersonvaughn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

From: Matt Olson via MIDRANGE-L <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: July 14, 2021 at 3:27:41 PM EDT
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Matt Olson <Matt.Olson@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Powertech Field Level Encryption and taking a SAVF
Reply-To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

How are you all taking a SAVF of a library that has tables encrypted with PowerTech and restoring that SAVF onto a completely different IBMi to refresh your dev libraries?

We currently decrypt everything (requires a complete outage of our systems so Powertech can get an exclusive lock on files) and then do the SAVF, then re-encrypt everything.

This takes a lot of downtime to perform, making data refreshes to other partitions very difficult and subsequently very infrequent due to the difficulty.

It is with this difficulty that we are contemplating switching to IBMi's built in full disk encryption instead and chuck Powertech out the window since we only use it for the data at rest functionality.

So we could get full disk coverage instead of the handful of columns from a few database files that have PII data in them encrypted. Additionally, we could finally do a WHERE SSN like %123% query again without bring the CPU to 100% for 5 minutes because the Powertech field procedure is choking on the data.

Thoughts?
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate link: https://amazon.midrange.com

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.