RE: IBM switching from ftp to secure ftp to download PTF's. -- MIDRANGE-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: RE: IBM switching from ftp to secure ftp to download PTF's.
From: Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 14:36:02 +0000
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

There is still one little issue with that thought.
NETSTAT *IFC
Shows a dozen local interfaces. Several Domino servers, web servers, etc.
You initiate a connection to IBM and it picks one to go out on. My RFE to be able to bind specific was rejected. No comm on a particular IP address to a particular address and the network guy says "Hassan chops!" I think the suggested work around by IBM was to set up routes to go out on certain IP addresses.

Rob Berendt

Follow-Ups:

RE: IBM switching from ftp to secure ftp to download PTF's. , midrangel

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.