Re: Jobs using over 100% CPU

In some ways that makes sense, but not how you might think it would. It’s so rare that you would see more that 1000% that I’m not sure I’d waste the money on it, but…..

When IBM expanded the size of the faults columns, they had to split the screen up into two panels when using the expert mode (F21, plus option 3) since 80 columns was no longer wide enough for all the columns.

So to accommodate the request Holger is suggesting, IBM would need to move that mode to 132 column screen. I’ve not done the math on the column sizes to see if 132 would actually allow a combined screen or not, but it would be worthwhile to find out.

Jim Oberholtzer
Agile Technology Architects

On May 18, 2021, at 7:27 AM, Holger Scherer <hs@xxxxxxx> wrote:

maybe worth an RFE to support more than 999,9% in the displays? ;-)

-h

Am 18.05.2021 um 13:58 schrieb Larry DrFranken Bolhuis <midrange@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:

And the maximum you can get on POWER8 and POWER9 would be 2,000%. This comes from the minimum allocation being 0.05 of a core. So if allocated for that, and uncapped as Jim says, then if you consume a full core WRKSYSSTS and WRKACTJOB will report 2,000%. Well they would but they show ++++ due to display space limitations. :-)

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate link: https://amazon.midrange.com