Re: Problems with QNTC -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Problems with QNTC
From: Justin Taylor <jtaylor.0ab@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 13:09:52 -0500
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Personally, I consider ENDJOBABN to be the nuclear option. It seems to
have fallout similar to nuclear radiation. I virtually always call IBM
before trying that command.

date: Thu, 13 May 2021 12:37:49 +0000

from: Tom Deskevich <TDeskevich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
subject: Problems with QNTC

An IPL fixed the problem. IBM told me a lock was caused by me doing the
ENDJOBABN. But there were locks even before I did that, that is WHY I did
the ENDJOBABN.
There are no PTFs out there that address this that I do not already have
installed.
Thanks for everyone's input.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Problems with QNTC , Jim Oberholtzer

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.