× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 1:06 PM <smith5646midrange@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Are you saying it is slower to update the same location than to write
somewhere else? That doesn't make since to me.

If the reads and writes can be handled by different hardware
(different hard disks, say) then in principle, most of the reading and
writing can happen at the same time.

So, performing N reads and N writes could potentially take as little
as approximately (1 read + N writes) worth of time.

Updating the data in place wouldn't allow that parallelization.
Further, with spinning disks, there could also be additional latency
between each operation.

I'm not saying that this is causing your time differential between SQL
and RPG. I'm just explaining how writing to a different location could
potentially be much faster than writing to the same location.

John Y.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.