Re: Need some help with SQL case/when performance -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Need some help with SQL case/when performance
From: Charles Wilt <charles.wilt@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 08:35:00 -0700
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Yep when NOT using commitment control and a table is journaled...

No real difference if commitment control is used for reasonably sized
transactions.

But 68M records is way, way to big for a single transaction.

Charles

On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 8:11 AM Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

True,
Resource
ID Option Feature Description
5770SS1 42 5117 HA Journal Performance
Can make a HUGE difference.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.