× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. January 2021

Re: Converting large amount of data

On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 10:30 PM Joe Pluta <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


I shouldn't have stuck the word name in there; the IBM document doesn't
use that word. I think I did it because I don't use the same record
name for two different database record formats. I only use the record
format from the physical when the logical has all the fields from the
physical. I know you don't have to do that, but that's the way I've
always done it.


I've always considered that the "right" way, the record format name
shouldn't match unless the record formats do.

Charles

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.