× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



If I read that right it’s in DB as opposed to nonDB. Correct?

Then it’s just I/O that QEDD is doing. No worries.



On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 3:22 PM Joe Pluta <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Hi Jason! It doesn't "matter". I was just taking an inventory and
anomalies always irk me. Our local replication machine (which actually
does more replication than the HA machine, because it's used for backups
and daisy-chains to a development machine) has almost zero paging. But
yes, I suppose I could suspend QEDD and see what it looks like.

I was just looking for a more surgical method than that. :)



On 4/23/2020 3:16 PM, Jason Olson wrote:
One thing you could do here first, close down QEDD and see if it
stops. If it does then you know for sure that QEDD is causing it.

But, since it's an HA system, and if it's running normally, does it
even matter?


On 4/23/2020 3:10 PM, Joe Pluta wrote:
So I've got a machine whose only official purpose in life is as an
offsite HA machine. It talks to our production machine over an
adequate but not extremely large pipe. It's very simply configured
with three pools, machine, base and spool. It's running at 8% CPU
utilization, and that's nearly all due to the QEDD (replication) jobs
(and an occasional appearance by our good friend QDBFSTCCOL).

And yet, I'm getting a ridiculous amount of Non-DB faulting and
paging. I mean it's crazy:

% CPU used . . . . . . . : 7.8 System ASP . . . . . . .
: 9674 G
Elapsed time . . . . . . : 00:09:20 % system ASP used . . .
: 32.9795
Jobs in system . . . . . : 819 Total aux stg . . . . .
: 9674 G
% perm addresses . . . . : .108 Current temporary used .
: 21897 M
% temp addresses . . . . : 1.118 Peak temporary used . .
: 25593 M


Sys Pool Reserved Max ------DB------- ----Non-DB-----
Pool Size M Size M Act Faults Pages Faults Pages
1 3110.39 1519.69 +++++ .0 .0 .0 .0
2 52876.82 9.46 372 14.3 1583.1 623.8 2405.6
3 6220.78 .00 126 .0 .0 .0 .1

It's been a while since I tracked this stuff down. Where do I go for
an initial look? And WRKSYSACT shows nothing out of the ordinary
either. The QEDD jobs, and tiny percentages from things like
RMTMSAFETA and SMXCAGERnn.

Thanks as always!





--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate
link: https://amazon.midrange.com


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.