×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
I don't use READC. Ever. Not with today's machine speeds. I use a
loop and compare current v. original values with an every-line read.
One unexpected consequence is that only truly changed fields get
processed ( in the infrequent scenario where the user changes it then
changes it back).
Also, I rarely update SFL records; I do a subfile refill at every
opportunity. My reasoning for this is that I want to get as far away as
I can from crammed screens, infrequent refreshes, and the concept of
screen-at-a-time processing. I want to get as close as I can to modern
practices as 5250 will allow.
On 1/1/2020 4:15 PM, Patrik Schindler wrote:
But I don't understand about your second sentence. Do I guess right that you're talking about a READC for the SFL? And UPDATE changed records in the SFL?
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
